Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1399

reference
442-tree-1
name
1399
tree-preservation-order

undefined

442-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.033796 50.898088)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.033711 50.898079,-1.033715 50.898095,-1.033727 50.898110,-1.033746 50.898122,-1.033769 50.898130,-1.033795 50.898133,-1.033822 50.898131,-1.033846 50.898123,-1.033865 50.898112,-1.033877 50.898097,-1.033882 50.898080,-1.033878 50.898063,-1.033866 50.898048,-1.033848 50.898036,-1.033824 50.898028,-1.033798 50.898025,-1.033771 50.898028,-1.033747 50.898035,-1.033728 50.898047,-1.033716 50.898062,-1.033711 50.898079)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL